- This topic is empty.
- 25/06/2007 at 7:19 pm #3522AnonymousInactive
Just thought I would share the above link with anyone who has not thought about inversion…..although quite an old story it is a really good read……it made me think and is why I put the Calshot Rally posting up (it is not too late to vote in the poll). I am heading towards the Secumar option (20 or 40 litres?) on the basis that I don’t intend to capsize at all (whereas the pad sewn into the sail seems to be for those who don’t object to the occasional capsize). (I am sure that over-simplifies the issue)
Does anyone have a recommendation for the size of block and srews/rivets for fitting the block to the mast head……….I can imagine there might be quite a force on the fitting with the secumar inflated and resisting inversion?
Any opinions welcome.
Dave30/06/2007 at 9:30 am #5427
Hi Dave – have used the 70l Secmar for a couple of years – not in anger thankfully!!
I drilled my masthead through and inserted a M6 bolt with two small pulley blocks either side , one for the topping lift (excellent piece of kit) and the other for the bag halyard , I only hoist the bag when the weather is marginal rather that keep it up there all the time. I have had two accidental inflations both when towing down to the beach over very rough ground with the mast up, it seems to shake the very small plastic pin out and crush the water soluble tablet (that may have got a bit damp from being up the mast in the rain for a few months) – better to be able to raise and lower it and at 21.00 GBP per re-arming kit it’s best kept safe!!
It is not only the safety aspect of avoiding inversion but also in shallow rough water , like up here in Liverpool Bay if you go over you will probably lose your mast – therefore the 70l version. I ALWAYS use the bag at sea.
Q30/06/2007 at 9:45 am #5428
Just noticed – I have the 40 litre version with a 70g CO2 cartridge – not 70litre!!!30/06/2007 at 11:39 am #5430AnonymousInactive
Thanks Q, just the information and encouragement I needed for a little (not so little) retail therapy…..I have not been rushing the decision as recently I have not been doing anything sailing-wise the least bit risky due to the family with me in the boat, but once in a blue moon I hope to sail solo and that is when some peace of mind is a major factor…I will try and avoid those accidental inflations!01/07/2007 at 6:27 pm #5433AnonymousInactive
At the end of the linked account of the inversion it says that wooden Wayfarers are anecdotally less prone to inversion. Is this true? If so, is this because of the wooden mast, or is it the the buoyancy configuration?
I have a GRP Wayfarer with a wooden mast.01/07/2007 at 8:10 pm #5435
You can also find the account in the Wayfarer Log library no 145.
the logs are all available on line:
http://wayfarer.org.uk/index.php?option=com_docman&Itemid=4203/07/2007 at 10:15 am #5442
What happens once the masthead buoyancy inflates and you manage to right your boat? Does the extra windage make another capsize (in strong winds) more likely, or do you discard it? It seems to me once it has been used you are a bit exposed in the event of another capsize if you have discarded the inflated buoyancy.
I ask because I capsized well out in a Scottish sea loch a couple of years ago and after the inversion and righting I would not have wanted extra windage at the top of the mast. I fitted an in-sail pocket as it seems to offer less intrusion and better multi capsize capability. I have yet to test it though, having also fitted extra reefing lines, but I am always interested in the best options.
When we went over the inversion was very rapid (wayfarer world with aluminium mast), giving no time to reach a grab bag or anything. As a result I keep essentials (flares, radio, phone, whistle etc) in a waistcoat over my bouyancy aid. Thus if I am in the water I have it all with me and there is little interference with normal sailing; indeed it means that the radio is always to hand and not at the other end of the boat when you need it.03/07/2007 at 10:59 am #5444
I had an accidential inflation and the begining of a two day cruise along the N Wales coast , wind was 5+ with a rough ride out of and into the Dee – rising 6 on the way in. I decided to keep the inflated bag up the mast considering that if I did go over I would rather it was up there to do a job, the same thoughts that I probably would have after an accidental capsize even if it did increase the possibility of going again. The only issue was the very annoying bangng of the CO2 bottle against the mast head!!
As with most things I don’t think that there is a perfect solution for all senarios – only the one you feel happy with – maybe both sewn in pad and auto inflate bag?
Q03/07/2007 at 9:19 pm #5452
We also sail a World.
We keep flares in a dry bag on a lanyard attached to the transom, the bag tends to float free of the boat when capsized so it’s then easy to access the flares if required.
Any piece of kit that you want to keep should be secured to the boat, all our loose gear (VHF,GPS, bucket etc) are on lanyards clipped to the boat. There are numerous stories of people capsizing and losing vital equipment because it is not secured to the boat.
The biggest disadvantage of the sailhead buoyancy (in sail pocket) is that as soon as you reef the buoyancy is rather less effective. There are also some doubts if you can get enough buoyancy with this method.04/07/2007 at 9:12 am #5454
Have you attached a extra bracket to the transom for your dry bag. I like the solution you have mentioned as I was wondering what to do with the larger flare pack, but as I have a main sheet traveller and do not want to interfere with that I was wondering where you attach the dry bag for the flares.
Fully agree with tying it all on – either to me or to the boat. This has saved me countless caps!04/07/2007 at 4:11 pm #5459
No, we have a rope bridle for the main sheet block, and it just clips onto that.
But I suppose you could fit something – we have access to the interior of the hull on the transom thru the inspection hatch.
bob04/07/2007 at 5:15 pm #5462W10143Member
On Barbie, the upper part of the transom (under the return) is solid – this is where Porters secured the rubber doorstops to secure the rear tank by through bolting them. I have removed the bolt and replaced with an eyebolt for each side – a good solid attachment point for anything (and everything)!
David06/08/2007 at 7:42 pm #5672
I have been trying to find out more about masthead buoyancy on the web, but apart from one hit on an ‘RS Vision’ (for which I can find no details but price) I cannot find any details in fittings, sizes etc on any systems.
Does anyone have any good links or further details? In particular Q can you confirm exactly what type yours is, as Google shows nothing for ‘secmar’.06/08/2007 at 8:05 pm #5675W10143Member
It’s SECUMAR. Excellent Kit.
David06/08/2007 at 8:14 pm #5676
Thank you David. More expense to keep the Girlfriend happy!
Do you raise on its own halyard or doe you leave it up permanently?
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.